In Java, you often write things like this, which are rather verbose:
1
2
URLEncoder.encode(...)
URLDecoder.decode(...)
Since Java 1.5 you can use static imports, but then you are stuck with the original function names as is, encode(...)
and decode(...)
.
A cool feature of Scala is that imports support renaming, so you can write instead:
1
2
import java.net.URLEncoder.{encode => encodeURL}
import java.net.URLDecoder.{decode => decodeURL}
And then you just use the functions under their new name:
1
2
encodeURL(...)
decodeURL(...)
This is neat if you have to use these functions many times in a given file.
Another common use of renames is to reduce name clashes. For example, Scala already has a number of things named Map
. If you are using a Java API expecting a java.util.Map
, you are likely to get name clashes.
In Java, you would probably resort to full qualification, e.g. java.util.Map
, and you can do the same in Scala, but that’s verbose. With renaming, you can write things like:
1
import java.util.{Map => JMap, List => JList}
And then use the Java Map
as JMap
and the Java List
as JList
. Nothing is changed at the VM level: it’s the same classes, but you now have a nice, short alias for them in the scope of the imports.
Comments powered by Disqus.